Kibbitznest Liberal Arts Discussions a collaboration with
The University of Chicago Graham School
hosting presentations and discussions of original research.

Tonight’s discussion,

What Are Popular Elections? - A View From Ancient China

With Stephen Walker, Phd

The de facto power of ordinary people to select their leaders fascinates classical Chinese political thinkers. But the idea that people could be granted de jure authority to do this—selecting their leaders through a regulated process of election, instead of just informally lending support to various contenders—seems never to have crossed their minds. What would these thinkers say if they were confronted with a system of government like ours, which grants short-term political authority to individuals on the basis of popularity, precisely quantified by votes?

In tonight’s presentation I’ll argue that, from a classical Chinese perspective, popular elections should be understood primarily as a tool used by the political elite to regulate its membership and to allocate responsibilities while running minimum risk of resistance. This follows from the nature of all legal institutions, which reflect the managerial agendas of a technocratic upper class. By seeking routine, formal, non-violent confirmation of public support, contending leaders secure their bona fides against each other (delegitimizing violence among peers); to the extent that this game is perceived to be fair, it allows ordinary people to feel included and heard even when their preferred contenders lose (delegitimizing violence against superiors).

Stephen C. Walker holds a PhD in Philosophy of Religions from the University of Chicago Divinity School. He studies philosophy & the history of philosophy across multiple traditions; his research focuses on classical Chinese thought & especially on Daoism. Walker has also worked extensively with Sanskrit materials, particularly those reflecting the classical heritage of exacting interreligious debate. Interests that inform his writing & teaching include the personal & social contexts for philosophical work, the ambiguity & malleability of concepts, & the role that humanistic studies can play in cultivating appreciation for diverse points of view.

Kibbitznest, Inc is so proud to be able to bring you scholarly discussions on various liberal arts disciplines. We welcome all over the age of 18 to enjoy the discussions and to also support the nonprofit with beverage and/or food purchases and also in tipping the hardworking servers, bartenders and food preparers; your presence and support is greatly appreciated!